| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:29 am Post subject: how to bypass the index.html |
 |
|
| I have a site i'm setting up that will have hundreds if not thousands of txt files. theres NO way i want to make a page with a link to every one. I wanted my server just to point to a directory and it would show everything in that directory, without the index file. I've seen this on other sites, just can't get it to work on Abyss. Its like it NEEDS to point to a specific file. |
|
| Back to top |
  |
 |
Anonymoose
-
Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 2192
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not at all.
Make your link to the directory with no page specified. Do not put an index.html file in the directory.
Make sure Automatic Directory Indexing is set to Yes in the Advanced section of Server Configuration, as shown in the manual, here :
http://www.aprelium.com/data/abyssws-x1-win-doc-html/serveradvanced.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| :) i'd swear i did all that but it pulled up fine now! thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe i spoke too soon! i'm trying to have a buddy log into it and it keeps doing a time out on him. i'm on a cable connection, the server is a 400mhz AMD with 128mb ram and a 4gig drive. The server is pulling from a second slave drive that has 200gigs.
any ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabe
-
Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 25
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe a IP problem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i'm using an ip from www.dynu.com. that could be it. if their servers are acting up |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
8-Ball
-
Joined: 10 Oct 2004
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Techbot wrote: | . i'm on a cable connection, the server is a 400mhz AMD with 128mb ram and a 4gig drive. The server is pulling from a second slave drive that has 200gigs.
|
nice server btw, did it work befor? if ti did, it is dynu fult, they have been known for it
_________________
You can win, but i can't lose |
|
| Back to top |
  |
|
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah i think i found the prob :) zonealarm firewall just sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
senshi
-
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 385
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rubbish, ZA does not suck it down to poor configuration by the user, I suggest you configure your firewall before you comment on how sucky a product is, if you really want a sucky firewall, go norton or McAfee, some thing I have experience in and can say that those Two are about the worst firewalls I have ever ran, ZA I have used for 7 years with no hack unlike Norton and McAfee. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anonymoose
-
Joined: 09 Sep 2003
Posts: 2192
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you got hacked with Norton or McAfee, it's down to 'poor configuration by the user'.
Any of the big PC firewalls are pretty much the same in terms of protection, it depends on the user being able to cope with the interface though. I'd admit, Norton's is awful. They butchered AtGuard on which it is based, same with McAfee - however, when properly setup, they will provide the same amount of protection as ZA, Kerio or any other professional product.
Regardless, there's no need to jump into a solved topic to slate someone's opinion on what caused the problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
senshi
-
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 385
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And thing is it was configured.... My whole point of stating as such, by experience and such like. Norton couldnt do what ZA could. Stop my machine from being hacked.
In all seriousness, I tried all of the major ones including Kiero and BlackICE of which BI was a joke, er, hello, sense of reality here, bunch of muppets... WHAT IF you already have an infected machine from some exploit future or otherwise..., so what if you only block incoming connections, its the crap thats leaving my machine IM more worried about!!! Like having a screen door in a submarine... Very leaky.
Yes, like I always say, theirs no software substitute for proper configuration. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Techbot
-
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 8
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| senshi wrote: | | Rubbish, ZA does not suck it down to poor configuration by the user, I suggest you configure your firewall before you comment on how sucky a product is, if you really want a sucky firewall, go norton or McAfee, some thing I have experience in and can say that those Two are about the worst firewalls I have ever ran, ZA I have used for 7 years with no hack unlike Norton and McAfee. |
i comment based on my usage of 2yrs and experience. some programs i use it simply conflicts with. pure and simple. it will NOT work with them. I use Sygate now and have no problems |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
senshi
-
Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 385
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yup and that too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
