| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AbyssUnderground
-
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 3855
|
|
| Back to top |
   |
 |
MonkeyNation
-
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 921
Location: Cardiff
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:06 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I approve of this thread. 'Cause if you order by latest you see me.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
    |
|
jibbajabba
-
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Location: England, Doncaster
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
300 days.. wow! is that actually the pc uptime or the webserver uptime.. longest my windows was up for was just over 3 weeks and the webserver was like over a week before i had to restart it to add cgi/perl stuff.
when i was using apache longest i had the webserver up for was 2 days and i had to reboot comp after 4 days.. abyss is the best CONGRATS!! aprelium
_________________
http://www.jibba-jabba.net | http://www.mosthauntedforum.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AbyssUnderground
-
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 3855
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
300+ days is the PC uptime.
_________________
Andy (AbyssUnderground) (previously The Inquisitor)
www.abyssunderground.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MonkeyNation
-
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 921
Location: Cardiff
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jibbajabba wrote: | 300 days.. wow! is that actually the pc uptime or the webserver uptime.. longest my windows was up for was just over 3 weeks and the webserver was like over a week before i had to restart it to add cgi/perl stuff.
when i was using apache longest i had the webserver up for was 2 days and i had to reboot comp after 4 days.. abyss is the best CONGRATS!! aprelium |
Unless Apache brought down your system, I don't really think you can say it was Apache's fault that your system was reset after four days.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abyssisthebest
-
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Posts: 319
Location: Boston, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its a well known fact that Apache uses approximatley 500% MORE system resources than Abyss.
_________________
My online Portfolio
Last edited by abyssisthebest on Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:31 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
AbyssUnderground
-
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 3855
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| abyssisthebest wrote: | | Its a well known fact that Apache uses approximatley 50% MORE system resources than Abyss. |
50%? more like 500%!!!
_________________
Andy (AbyssUnderground) (previously The Inquisitor)
www.abyssunderground.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abyssisthebest
-
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Posts: 319
Location: Boston, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was close.........
It uses so much i coulden't remember the actual figure, :D
_________________
My online Portfolio |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AbyssUnderground
-
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 3855
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| abyssisthebest wrote: | I was close.........
It uses so much i coulden't remember the actual figure, :D |
LOL. It uses about 40MB doesnt it? I don't use it so I don't know the exact figure either.
_________________
Andy (AbyssUnderground) (previously The Inquisitor)
www.abyssunderground.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jibbajabba
-
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 241
Location: England, Doncaster
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
when i ran apache in processors the ammount it was using was 20,000k and 18,000k the longer it was up the higher the processors would be.. abyss at the present moment for me is using 656k and 352k which its always using.. it never goes over 1,000k :-)
_________________
http://www.jibba-jabba.net | http://www.mosthauntedforum.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AbyssUnderground
-
Joined: 31 Dec 2004
Posts: 3855
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
528KB and 344KB for me. I assume the lower one is the crash protection.
_________________
Andy (AbyssUnderground) (previously The Inquisitor)
www.abyssunderground.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
p3
-
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 615
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As for Apache, let me check....
Two instances currently running, one using 7,444 K and the other using 21,816 K. Then we have their little monitor, using 746 K, so the grand total comes to 30,006 K. Yep, that's bloated all right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aprelium
-
Joined: 22 Mar 2002
Posts: 6800
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Inquisitor wrote: | | 528KB and 344KB for me. I assume the lower one is the crash protection. |
344 KB are used by the actual HTTP server process. The process with 528 KB manages the Windows interface (the little window, the tray icon, and other related GUI features) as well as the crash protection.
_________________
Support Team
Aprelium - http://www.aprelium.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
